
The storyline focusses on the band of 15 gypsies, especially upon Tranoche, who is bordering on maniacal at times. It was much more than just physicality, he was at times a whirling dervish. In the end he is hunted down like a dog, but not before he shows much love to the orphaned Claude. The period setting was faithfully portrayed and the lighting and colouring restrained. The soundtrack was infused with music as was the life of the gypsies. However, the gypsies' thirst for freedom makes a sedentary lifestyle difficult to bear. They are rounded up by the nazis with much help from the local sympathisers of the Vichy Regime.
Guide: A small atmospheric film (8/10)
Coco Chanel & Igor Stravinsky

When trying to hightlight the barriers that Chanel had to negotiate to make an impact and have her creativity acknowledged, you do her a dis-service by down-playing the considerable contribution of Stravinsky. During the period of this film (early '20s) he had sooo much going on, that to be ravished emotionally like this would have made impossible to achieve. Keep things in perspective. Tell the truth, even when from a different angle.
Kirsten much prefered the Coco story of last year with Audrey Tatou. I suspect this showed a more realistic version of Chanel who was no wilting violet, and the actress, being unknown to me, did not come with a gentle, sweet history.
Guide: Hard to accept but beautiful (6/10)
Queen to play

There are a number of scenes where the film-maker tries to explain the joy and release that Bonaire's character finds in chess. The image here shows one such scene. The closing scenes of the film with her screaming into the ocean is another.
Afterwards, the four of us went to the cafe above Berkoulou's on Norton Street where there was a lovely jazz singer crooning along with a most accomplished pianist who used an Apple laptop instead of sheet music. Lovely night.
Guide: A joy to watch even for this non-chessplayer (8/10)
The Army of Crime

The first hour of the film is a challenge, and the audience is not spoon-fed. Understanding the relationships between this motley group takes time. Recreation of the period is astoundingly good, distracting to some extent. The scene in the dungeon when the main characters are tortured is confronting.
I am finding myself more and more able to hear individual words in French. Many I do not know but I can hear the breaks between the sounds now. This is a vital first step, I feel.
Guide: complex and confusing and very long. But very authentic.(6/10)
Tomorrow at Dawn

The younger brother seems not to have grown up but has the emotional reactions and enthusiams of a ten year old. He is a history reenactment buff, but all those involved blur the edges of the game and the reality, to the point of death.
There are a number of scenes where the audience laughed out loud, eg the dining scene when the musician gets a sense of how real this is for the others at the table, and when the brothers drive away from a duel dressed in their Napoleonic uniforms.
Guide: A poorly explained film. The two main characters existed in a vacuum. (5/10)
Leaving

What is missing from the marriage that causes KST's character to make the choices she does? Yes, there is no explaining sudden lust and her character is described as being "on heat". She leaves her two children, and her life, to live the life of an itinerant fruit picker who has to pawn a watch for petrol.
Are we to believe that the comparison of sex with husband, and sex with her lover are meant to represent the divide that caused her to act as she does? She is rejected by her daughter and does not react. Her son tries to remain her friend but she does nothing to quell his disquiet. Very much a feminist tract.
Guide: Another fine performance from KST. More information about her marriage would have been useful.(7/10)
Welcome

Guide: Excellent film: acting, photography, script, ending.(9/10)
Anything for her

They have a small boy, Oscar, who controls much of the emotion of the film. One gets the slight impression that Julien is more committed to Lisa (Diane Kruger) than she may be to him. But this is not investigated either. The story is his devotion and total belief in her and how he is going to get them together again. He is a teacher and a regular guy. But even the police at the end do not believe this.
Guide: This was an excellent film of its genre - drama/thriller. No my usual fare but approached from a different angle. The script was tight, the characters were believable, and there was no groan at the end. (8/10)
3 comments:
You are a busy lady with all your activities. Getting the most out of retirement. Good for you. We have the French film festival too not sure when. We've seen a few in past years.
Retiring like I have is a challenge. I am nearly 62 and all my friends still work! Also, I do not have a partner (nor am I keen to get one, thank you very much!) so organised activiities are the way to go.
I like the FFF because the films are "small" and illuminate "odd" parts of the human experience. I like that.
This year I have 4 sessions with my daughter and 4 sessions with a friend, eg this weekend I have a film Fri, Sat, Sun. I will be drained by the end.
Do you recommend this movie? From your description I am not sure if it is too much on a kitschy side for my taste. Though its plot sounds very interesting.
Post a Comment